×
1 Tuesday, April 16, 2019 09:42

Flood of ‘fake’ five-star reviews inundating Amazon, Which? finds

Amazon’s customer review system is being undermined by a flood of “fake” five-star reviews for products from unfamiliar brands, a new investigation claims.The consumer group Which? analysed the listings of hundreds of popular tech products in 14 online categories including headphones, dashcams, fitness trackers and smartwatches, checking for telltale signs of suspicious reviews.
Its researchers found that top-rated items were dominated by brands with names such as Itshiny, Vogek and Aitalk, which in many cases had thousands of unverified reviews – meaning there was no evidence that the reviewer had even bought or used the item.Many items also boasted a high number of five-star ratings posted in a short space of time – another indicator suggesting inauthentic reviews.
With headphones, all the products on the first page of results sorted by average customer review were from little-known brands and 87% of more than 12,000 reviews for these products were by unverified purchasers. Seventy-one per cent of the headphones had perfect five-star ratings, while some included reviews for unrelated products such as soap dispensers.
One set of headphones made by the brand Celebrat had 439 reviews. All were five-star, all unverified, and all arrived on the same day.Amazon to give power to brands to remove fakes from website Read moreWhich? found similar results when searching for smartwatches, with unverified reviews making up 99% of reviews for the top four products.
“Our research suggests that Amazon is losing the battle against fake reviews, with shoppers bombarded by comments aimed at artificially boosting products from unknown brands,” said Natalie Hitchins, the head of home products at Which?.“Amazon must do more to purge its websites of unreliable and fake reviews if it is to maintain the trust of its millions of customers.
To avoid being misled and possibly buying a dud product, customers should always take reviews with a pinch of salt and look to independent and trustworthy sources when researching a purchase.”Neither Which? nor the Guardian were able to contact any of the brands cited in the report, or to identify the source of the suspicious reviews.
Amazon said in a statement: “[We] invest significant resources to protect the integrity of reviews in our store because we know customers value the insights and experiences shared by fellow shoppers. We have clear participation guidelines for both reviewers and selling partners and we suspend, ban and take legal action on those who violate our policies.
.”..
Full Story

News Code: 110859  |  The Guardian
All news has been gathered by RoboNews Crawler

Related News

Latest Technology news

Technology

Latest news pictures
  • Why Diversification Matters
  • Demand is so high for 'Avengers: Endgame' that many AMC theaters will open 24 hours a day all weekend
  • Sean Hannity knew about the famous Trump Tower meeting more than a week before it became public, according to the Mueller report
  • Sri Lanka attacks: Authorities face scrutiny over advance warnings
  • Facebook hires top State Department lawyer as general counsel
  • The cost of oil shoots above $65 a barrel as the White House vows to bring Iran exports to zero
  • The Best Competitors to Every First-Party Google App and Service
  • Speed Up Your PC With a 1TB SSD For Just $100
  • China's New Video Game Rules Officially Ban Blood, Corpses, Mahjong, and Poker
  • 8 Unanswered Questions From 'Game Of Thrones' Episode 2: 'A Knight Of The Seven Kingdoms'
  • With Coachella Wrapped, Goldenvoice Heads West to Long Beach for Summer Festival Season
  • How Kelsey Lu Processed a Painful Past Into a Message of Hope on Her Debut Album 'Blood'
  • Kacey Musgraves Adds West Coast Dates to Oh, What A World: Tour II
  • Martin Garrix Teases Collab With Macklemore & Fall Out Boy's Patrick Stump: Listen
  • Ariana Grande's 13 Most Unforgettable Tweets
  • Snake-Inspired Robot Slithers Fast
  • How Blindness Shapes Sound Processing
  • Defying the Laws of Physics? Bubbles of Sand
  • Jamie Carragher lambasts Manchester United display against Everton
  • Episode 35: Jack Johnson/ALO's Zach Gill & Son Volt's Jay Farrar
  • ‘KUWTK: The Most Unforgettable Sibling Fights The...
  • Dell Technologies extends systems integrator agreement with Cisco
  • Linux on DeX now supports the Galaxy S9, Galaxy Tab S5e, and Galaxy Note 8, and hints at upcoming Galaxy Tab S5 support
  • What Black Widow Could Learn From Thanos
  • Big Video Game Sale On Now at Amazon: Kingdom Hearts, RE2 and More
  • Bad News for Spotify? Amazon Launches Free Music Streaming Service
  • REI has a little-known section of its website that sells gently used gear and clothes for up to 70% off — here's how it works
  • A $2,000 bridal get-up, $100 of body glitter, and $30 thrift store discoveries: We asked 11 people how much their Coachella outfits cost, and here's what they told us
  • Here's exactly why experts recommend one type of life insurance over the other
  • Barcelona boss Ernesto Valverde reveals La Liga demand before Liverpool clash
  • Qatar opens Gaza artificial limb and rehab centre
  • 'Just their shoes': Sri Lanka struggles to identify the dead
  • Your Corpse Is Likely Getting All Kinds of Fun New Options in Washington State
  • Blind People Really Do Have More Sensitive Hearing, MRI Study Finds
  • Meghan McCain's Explosive Feud with Joy Behar Continues on 'The View', Whoopi Goldberg Cuts to Commercial
  • Polyphonic Spree Announce #CareForTheCaravan Benefit for Migrants
  • Jamie Carragher lambastes Manchester United display against Everton
  • ‘Avengers: Endgame’: Why Fans Will Feel...
  • These Are the Rarest Animals in the World
  • Who Will Meet Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s Baby First?